“Literature,
exclusively, in its poetic and prose styles”, Sa´adeh states, “is a skill
intended to reveal the thought and consciousness as much precisely and
magnificently as it could be”.[1] For him, the poet is a talented person
whose main concern is to highlight beauty and greatness in both spiritual and
material spheres. As he puts it:
The poet, to me, is he who
is concerned with highlighting the most esteemed and the most beautiful in
every realm of thought, feelings or matter. I here add that I see as one of the
most important characteristics of poetry the highlight of feelings, emotions
and sensation in every thought or every cause that upholds the elements of the
soul, and giving those feelings, sensation and emotions figurative or
imaginative images, that have the elements of strength, beauty and sublimation,
without parting company with the truth and the human goal.[2]
Sa´adeh
emphasizes though that literature is not exactly the thought or the
consciousness. Thus, it cannot of its own cause innovation. “That is why I
believe that innovation in literature is an effect and not a cause, it is an
effect caused by a renewal or transformation in thought and consciousness as
well as in life and the attitude towards it. It is an outcome of spiritual,
materialistic and socio-political revolution taking place that changes the life
of an entire people, its living conditions and opens new horizons for the
intellect and its methods and the consciousness and its trends”.[3] Literature is not independent from the
process of national revival; rather, it is very linked to it. It is an
expression of it. As Sa´adeh conceptualized, literature “seeks
the foremost fundamental reality of a better life in a world of beauty and
higher values.”[4]
Generally
speaking, literature, according to Sa´adeh, accompanies life by expressing its
fundamental nature and disclosing its facts and mysteries. Moreover,
literature can serve the nation’s interests and fulfill its needs by expressing
its aspirations and lofty ideals and revealing its talents and capabilities.
It can be, as he says, “a lighthouse for peoples”, not a mirror for them.[5] From this it follows that the scholar must
be committed to his people and their causes, articulating their aspirations and
striving to transform their present circumstances into a better future. It can
be seen, accordingly, that Sa´adeh’s views of literature reflected the national
sentiment, that swept the Arab World throughout the second decade of the
twentieth century, and the fervent quest for national and political identity.
Rabi’a Abifadel noted, in agreement with Antun Ghattas Karam, that:
He [Sa´adeh] belonged to an
elite group of writers of the age of literary revival in the Arab East who
formulated prose-poems that “revolt against injustice and feudalism, objectify
the maladies begot in colonization, appeal to valour and energy in the struggle
against ignorance, poverty, and slavery, call for the liberation of woman and
encourage the spread of knowledge.”[6]
According to Sa´adeh, literature is not an irresponsible game or a hobby produced for
personal enjoyment. Rather, it is an art that can be used to arrive at a new
understanding of life, elevating the souls to a
higher level. Moreover, literature plays an important role in national education and socialization. It strives to be a universal literature that carrys a mission to the world and attracts its attention. How can
literature be universal? Simply stated, it can be universal by functioning as a
means to convey the thought and consciousness that emanate from the “new
outlook” to the sentiment of society and its comprehension and to the hearing
of the whole world and its eyesight.[7]
[1] Antun Sa´adeh, As-Sira’
al-Fikri fil-Adab as-Suri, (Intellectual
Struggle in Syrian Literature) (Beirut: SSNP, 1960), p. 29.
[2] Ibid., 31-32.
[3] Ibid., p. 29.
[4] Ibid., p. 69.
[5] Ibid., p. 45.
[6] Rabia´ah Abi Fadel,, Antun
Sa´adeh: The Mahajari Scholar and
Critic, (Maktabat
al-Deerasset al-Ilmyyah, Lebanon, 1992), p. 205. See also Adel Beshara (ed.) Antun
Sa´adeh: The Man, His Thought – An Anthology, UK: Ithaca, 2007, p. 457.
[7] Antun Sa´adeh, As-Sira’
al-Fikri fil-Adab as-Suri, op.
cit., p. 66.